Our Profile:
The journal AGRICULTURA (A) publishes scientific works from the following fields: animal science, plant production, farm mechanisation, land management, agricultural economics, ecology, biotechnology, microbiology
ISSN 1581-5439
Home Issues Issue 4 A short review of chain controlling systems in livestock production technology

A short review of chain controlling systems in livestock production technology

Dejan ŠKORJANC, Maksimiljan BRUS, Igor VOJTIC
pp. 26-31

There is a general agreement that the main reason for domestication was to provide a reliable source of food protein. Wild animals were hunted for thousands of years, killed for meat, wool, fur, and liquid by our predecessors. This one-way relationship between humans and animals was changed much later, during domestication and until know, the man took responsibility for animals and changed and developed different production system and ethical relationship with animals. After Second World War, the governments tried to change so called traditional agriculture to more intensive. Animals have been kept in high concentration and for the continuous production as a consequence, disease control became essential. European Union issued a paper on food safety (White Paper on Food Safety 2000) where the EU commission tried to push forward a framework of legislation for further improvement and to develop more transparent and improved quality standards throughout a food chain from farm to table. This paper reviews a number of recent developments, starting with an integrated quality control system that collecting important data from the animal birth, through to the animal rearing phase to the end (i. e. slaughter). The importance of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) is discussed, together with their concepts to assure safe animal food production.

Key words: animals; chain controlling systems; food safety

CITATED REFERENCES :

1. Aumaitre A, Aulrich K, Chesson A, Flachowsky G, Piva G. New feeds from genetically modified plants: substantial equivalence, nutritional equivalence, digestibility, and safety for animals and the food chain. Livestock Prod. Sci. 2002;74:223-238.

2. Bauman D. E. Bovine somatotropin: review of an emerging animal technology. J. Dairy Sci. 1992;75:3432-3451.

3. Blaha Th. Epidemiology and quality assurance application to food safety. Prevo Vet. Med. 1999;39:81-92.

4. Bonneau M, Laarveld B. Biotechnology in animal nutrition, physiology and health. Livestock Prod. Sci. 1999;59:223-241.

5. Centi G, Perathoner S. Remediation of water contamination using catalytic technologies. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2003;41(1-2):15-29.

6. Cowan C. Irish and European consumer views on food safety. J. Food Safety. 1998;18(4):275-295.

7. Galbraith H. Hormones in international meat production: biological sociological and consumer issues. Nutrition Res. Rev. 2002;15(2):293-314.

8. Garner J, Coleman A. Therapeutic proteins from livestock. In: Clark AJ (eds.), Animal Breeding. Technology for the 21st Century. Harwood academic publishers, New Delhi, 1998:215-228.

9. Gorman R, Bloomfield S, Catherine C, Adley A. Study of cross contamination of food-borne pathogens in the domestic kitchen in the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2002;76(1-2):143-150.

10. Hinton M. H. Infection and intoxications associated with animal feed and forage which may present a hazard to human health. The Veterinary J. 2000;159(2):124-138.

11. Houdebine L. M. Transgenesis to improve animal production. Livestock Prod. Sci. 2002;74:255-268.

12. Karg H, Meyer H. H. D. Update evaluation of trenbolone acetate, zeranol and melengesterol acetate as growth promoters (consideration concerning the »hormone issues« between EU and USA at the WTO. Archive für Lebensmittelhygiene. 1999;50(2):28-37

13. Kleter G. A, Kuiper H. A. Consideration for the assessment of the safety of genetically modified animals used for human food or animal feed. Livestock Prod. Sci. 2002;74:275-285.

14. Jones G. F. Genetics aspects of domestification, common breeds and their origin. In: Rothschild M. F, Ruvinsky A (eds.), The genetics of the pig. CAB International, University Press Cambridge, 1998:17-50

15. La Bonnardiere C. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy: epidemiology and diagnosis. Agricultura. 2002;1:1-7.

16. Murray A C. The evaluation of muscle quality. In: Jones S. D. M (ed.), Quality and grading of carcasses of meat animals. CRC Press, Inc., Florida, USA, 1995:83-108.

17. Nicholson F. A, Chambers B. J, Williams J. R, Unwin R J. Heavy metal contents of livestock feeds and animal manures in England and Wales. Bioresource Technology. 1999;70(1):23-31.

18. Q'Keeffe M, Kennedy O. Residues - a food safety problem? J. Food Safety. 1998;18(4):297-319.

19. Petersen B, Knura-Deszecka S, Pnsgen-Schmidt E, Gymnich S. Computerised food safety monitoring in animal production. Livestock Prod. Sci. 2002;76:207-213.

20. Pugh D. M. The EU precautionary bans of animal feed additive antibiotics. Toxicology Letters. 2002;128:35-44.

21. Pursel V. G.. Modification production traits. In: Clark AJ (ed.), Animal Breeding. Technology for the 21st Century. Harwood academic publishers, New Delhi, 1998:183-200.

22. Rohrs M. Geschichte der Tierzucht. Entwiklung der Haustiere. In: Kraeusslich H. et al (eds.), Tierzuechtungslehre. Verlag Eugen Ulmer Stuttgart, Stuttgart, 1994:37-55.

23. Simonneaux L.. Le clonage animal. Approche a I usage de I enseignant. Educagri editions, Dijon, 1998.

24. Stelwagen K, Verrinder Gibbins A. M, McBride B. W. Applications of recombinant DNA technology to improve milk production: a review. Livestock Prod. Sci. 1992;31:153-178.

25. Stranzinger, K. Allgemaine Tierzucht. Verlag Eugen Ulmer Stuttgart, Stuttgart, 1993:17-19.

26. Smith DeWaal C. Safe food from a consumer perspective. Food Cont. 2003;14:75-79.

27. White D, Langford G. Xenografts from livestock. In: Clark AJ (ed.), Animal Breeding Technology for the 21st Century. Harwood academic publishers, New Delhi, 1998:229-242.

28. Wierup M. The experience of reducing antibiotics used in animal production in the Nordic countries. Int. J. Antimicrobial Agents: 2001;18:287-290.

29. Wray-Cahen C. D, Kerr D. E, Evock-Clover C. M, Steele N. C. Redefining body composition: nutritiens, hormones, and genes in meat production. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1998;18:63-92.

30. Opinion of the scientific committee on veterinary measures relating to public health on identification of species/categories of meat-producing animals in integrated production systems where meat inspection may be revised (adopted on 20-21 June 2001), European Commission Health & Consumer Protection Directorate- General, 13p.

31. Restoring consumers’ confidence as regards food safety. The European compound feed industry contribution to the reflection about the EU commission White Paper on food safety. (28.04.2000).

32. White paper on food safety of 12 January 2000. (04.12.2002) http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub06_en.pdf