Our Profile:
The journal AGRICULTURA (A) publishes scientific works from the following fields: animal science, plant production, farm mechanisation, land management, agricultural economics, ecology, biotechnology, microbiology
ISSN 1581-5439
Home Issues Issue 10 Citrus overview of the European Union-15 and Turkey

Citrus overview of the European Union-15 and Turkey

Halil FİDAN
pp. 55-62

The citrus is important for Turkish fruit sector; it provides approximately 42% of export value to Turkish economy in total fruit sector, 15% of quantity producing in EU. The citrus sector occupies a central place in agriculture of the Mediterranean area in Turkey, and it provides about 70% of total citrus production. The majority of Turkish Citrus fruit export to countries in the European Union-15. The entry price system applies to a subset of fruit and vegetables considered particularly “sensitive” in the EU. It provides a high degree of protection to EU growers of citrus products. In Turkey, citrus growers have not protection, citrus prices is formed by supply and demand, this cause seasonal price fluctuation. Turkish incorrect policies on the part of the government the citrus sector started to show severe signs of weaknesses and the productivity and quality of citrus in Turkey decreased. The main reasons for this, is the lack of support on the part of growers and exporter, and the attitude of the state toward the sector. There is a huge lack of support in all aspects of citrus production and marketing.

Key word: citrus, export, import, consumption, prices

REFERENCES

1. Akgüngör S, Barbaras F, Kumral N. Competitiveness of the Turkish fruit and vegetable processing industry in the European union market, Russ east Eur finance trade, 2002;38/3: 34-53

2. Allen T. Turkey and The EU, Statistics in Focus, European Communities, C.N.: KS-NO-00-005-EN-I, Eurostat / C4, L-2920, Luxembourg , 2000.

3. Argilos J.M. Regional Diversity in the Fruit Sector in the European Union. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, 1999.

4. CEC (Commission of the European Communities). On the State of Implementation of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96,On the Common Organization of The Market
in Fruit and Vegetables, Report from the Commission to the Council, Brussels, 2001.

5. DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs).Horticultural Marketing Inspectorate, Annual Report 2000-2001, UK, 2001.

6. DPT (Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı). Meyvecilik, Yedinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı ÖİK Raporu Yayın: DPT
2469- ÖİK 516. Ankara, 1997,2000.

7. DPT (Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı). Meyvecilik Narenciye Raporu, 8.Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, ÖİK Raporu, Ankara, 2000.

8. EC (European Communities). Trade Regime for Agricultural Products, Decision no 1/98 of the EC-Turkey Association council, Official Journal of the European
Communities, L 86/1, Brussels, 1998.

9. EUROSTAT (Statistical Office of the European Commission) 2005; http://europa.eu.int/comm/eurostat/

10. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) 2005; www.fao.org

11. Garaulet J. Glossary of the Common Agricultural Policy and the Agenda 2000 Reform, Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development Series, AGRI 118 EN, European Parliament, Brussels, 2000.

12. Gorton M.,Davidova S.,Ratinger T. The Competitiveness of Agriculture in Bulgaria and the Czech Republic Vis-á-Vis the European Union. (CEEC and EU Agricultural Competitiveness). Comparative Economic Studies, 2000; 42:59–86, L - 2929 Luxembourg.

13. Harold G, Stefan T. The EU Import Regime for Fresh Fruit and Vegetable after Implementation of the Results of the Uruguay Round. FAO Economic and Social Department, Göttingen, 1998.